County pension expense rises 5,000
percent over 10 years
By Dai Meagher
Back in 2002, Nevada County's annual pension
expense was a mere $200,000. Nine years later, the County's annual
pension expense ballooned to $10.6 million — a growth rate of 5,195
percent. By comparison, the S&P 500 increased just 36 percent.
During the same 10-year period, the County's health benefit expense grew
by 460 percent — rising from $600,000 for 2002 to $3.2 million for 2011.
But 2011 wasn't a quirk year. In fact, the rapid jump in pension and
benefit expenses began around 2007 — which coincides with the time local
financial professional Mike McDaniel first published his cautionary
report on Nevada County pensions. To fully grasp the magnitude of this
increase, let's divide the past 10 years into parts. Part one represents
the five years from 2002 through 2006. Part two represents the following
five years of 2007 through 2011.
For the five years comprising part one, the county's pension expense was
$12.9 million — an average of $2.6 million per year.
But during part two, county pension expense came to $50 million — an
average of $10 million per year.
This rapid rate of increase is reflected in Nevada County's health
benefits, as well.
For the fiscal years 2002 to 2006, health benefit expense totaled $4
million, an average of $800,000 per year. But from 2007 to 2011, health
benefit expense averaged $3, million per year for a total of $15
million.
If the incoming revenues to the county had increased by a similar
amount, the rise in county pension and heath benefit expense could
possibly be overlooked. Unfortunately, during the same 10 years, total
county revenues increased by only 70 percent. So, in 2002, the total
pension and health expenses were less than 1 percent of the county's
revenues in 2002, but in 2011, they now equal 10 percent of the county's
revenues.
We know the county's management, supervisors, and most of its unions
have implemented some measures to reduce pension costs. But it has not
been demonstrated to the public that these measures are sufficient.
As reported in The Union in November, the average age of the 836 county
employees is 48 with nine years of employment service.
This means that within seven years hundreds of county employees will be
eligible to retire at 43 percent of their annual pay.
Further burdening the situation is the fact that the county's funding
for pensions and benefits is $120 million short.
In addition, CalPERS belatedly acknowledged that their projected growth
rate on investments is too optimistic. Though they only reduced their
projection by a quarter of a percent, this translates to an even higher
pension contribution required by Nevada County.
Given these circumstances, it seems appropriate for the leaders of our
county government to formally present a detailed analysis of the
projected pension expenses for the next ten years, as well as their plan
to fund the $120 million in pension liabilities.
Author's note: All amounts were obtained from Nevada County's published
“government-wide” financial statements, with immaterial rounding applied
by the author.
(This article was published in the Union newspaper Weds. May 9, 2012).
Back